Es ist eine Neuverfilmung des ersten James-Bond-Romans Casino Royale von . Der Film wurde nach Angaben der Filmkritik-Website Rotten Tomatoes von. Mit den Golden Tomato Awards ehrt die amerikanische Kritikerwebsite Rotten Tomatoes seit , James Bond Casino Royale · Die Queen. Du interessierst dich für Casino Royale Rotten Tomatoes? Dann jetzt unsere Webseite besuchen und Casino Royale Rotten Tomatoes umsonst anschauen.
Even Brosnan admitted that the series would have had to raise its game in the face of what The Bourne Identity did; watching that and Die Another Day now, it's hard to believe that they came from the same decade, let alone the same year.
Casino Royale manages to match The Bourne Supremacy for quality, borrowing some of its aesthetic touches particularly in the chase sequences while also capturing the intrigue of Ian Fleming's original novel.
Like Paul Greengrass, Martin Campbell understands the need to knit action and character scenes together to create a holistic, gripping package; the action feels like an integral and natural part of the drama, rather than interrupting it in order to show off the budget.
Campbell brings the same calm, steady and methodical touch that he brought to Goldeneye; having saved Bond from irrelevance once, he does it again in some style.
Skyfall so often gets praised for acknowledging Bond's past while still being modern and relevant, but Casino Royale manages to pull off this same trick, and arguably does it slightly better.
Where Skyfall consciously tips its hat to the older films through costumes, characters or props such as the iconic Aston Martin DB5 , Casino Royale is more subtle; all the classic elements are there, but they've been modernised and refined so that they make more sense in the real world.
It's still fitting for Bond to drive an Aston Martin, and it's a nice touch to see its distant predecessor roll by. But it wouldn't make sense for Bond's car to have many gadgets that he doesn't need, and having the car be wrecked to save Vesper makes complete sense.
Where Roger Moore or Brosnan's films glorified the gadgets, this restores some welcome credibility and keeps the hardware under wraps unless absolutely necessary.
Along these same lines, the screenplay takes all the best elements of Fleming's novel and transposes them into a contemporary setting.
It still has all the glamour of the classic casino scenes from the Sean Connery era, but the playful banter and flirting has been replaced with high stakes, tense glances and much more serious consequences.
Le Chiffre's relationships with arms dealers and dodgy speculation on the stock market felt current for its day and still feels very fresh; great effort is expended to ground the character's motivations while maintaining an air of intrigue, mystery and threat.
The film takes itself seriously, but not too seriously; it wants to have fun, but it puts credibility above out-and-out entertainment, unlike many of Moore's entries in the canon.
Le Chiffre's characterisation is also an interesting departure from what the Bond villain archetype has become. Where the likes of Drax, Stromberg and Blofeld wanted to single-handedly destroy or take over the world, Le Chiffre is essentially a middle-man; he is to the Craig era what Kristatos was in For Your Eyes Only, but better written and with a more interesting, more murky motivation.
Like Bond, he is ultimately a pawn of bigger forces who struggles at times not to buckle under the pressure as the torture scene demonstrates ; by making him so small, he becomes more believable and more intimidating, even without the bleeding eye.
He may look like the lead singer of Franz Ferdinand in his haircut and dress sense, but Mads Mikkelson plays him brilliantly, bringing a cold, dead-eyed feel to the character which both intrigues and repulses an audience.
Creating convincing poker scenes in films is pretty difficult. The vast majority of efforts go for a highly stylised or choreographed approach, where audience expectations are pandered to through needless editing trickery; think of the final hand in The Cincinnati Kid, or the royal flush sequence in Maverick.
Casino Royale's poker scenes may be more stylised than those in, say, The Sting or Rounders, but they are still very well-executed with good pacing and a frisson of unpredictability.
What really makes them work, however, is the build-up in the script; there are little poker motifs dotted throughout, with comments about tells and misdirection.
Because the film makes such a big theme out of bluffing and people not being what they seem, the card games don't feel like isolated set-pieces, and the later developments with Mathis and Vesper feel credible and yet still surprising.
It isn't just that both characters ultimately don't make it past the final reel; the characters are both instrumental in the making of Bond, an affront and a challenge to his impulsive, playboy instincts and a safe refuge from the madness of his job and the people he has to kill.
Eva Green is every bit as gripping and electric on screen as Diana Rigg before her; Vesper goes toe-to-toe with Bond and we get genuine character development, making her betrayal and death all the more shocking and heartbreaking.
Craig's Bond is a changed man by the end of the film - it's just a pity that the resolution to his heartbreak in Quantum of Solace was as underwhelming and mishandled as the similar attempt in Diamonds Are Forever.
The heartbreak surrounding Vesper brings us onto another of Casino Royale's great successes: Desmond Llewellyn's Q may have advised Bond that he should never let his enemies see him bleed, but the best Bond films have never been afraid of putting him through the mill, getting him into dangerous situations which can only be resolved at great cost - a cost often numbed by women and alcohol.
The fight scenes in Casino Royale feel brutal, just as they should do; it isn't interesting to have someone waltz through conflict as though it was nothing.
The torture scene and the defibrillator scene are great in isolation, but they are matched by Bond's emotional torment of losing Vesper.
For the first time since Timothy Dalton's era - or Goldeneye at a push - Bond's pain feels real and meaningful. All of which brings us to Daniel Craig as Bond.
While his subsequent films have been hit-and-miss, his performance here is more than enough to silence those who criticised his casting all those 'James Blonde' jokes sound all the more desperate now.
He takes the suffering and burnt-out approach that Dalton brought and fuses it with some of Connery's unabashed cool to create a truly modern and contemporary Bond.
He also has the confidence to eschew convention as much as he chooses to reflect or inhabit it; we get a build-up to a cliched sex scene, but then he's quickly on his toes and back to the plot.
Casino Royale is a great, gripping spy thriller and arguably the finest of all the James Bond films. While it is slightly too long and a little too candid with some of its product placement, it remains an extraordinary reinvention of a franchise which had long been in need of a boost.
Craig impresses in his first and finest performance as Bond, and Martin Campbell directs with great common sense and precision to create a majestic and immensely enjoyable film.
Whether looking at the newer films or the franchise as a whole, this has set a very high bar which has yet to be beaten.
With Daniel Craig reinventing the role like never before, Casino Royale reboots the Bond franchise with gusto and intelligence not seen before in the long running franchise.
Thanks to the best story of the series to date, Casino Royale features the right blend of exhilarating action and heart pounding drama.
Daniel Craig is the best Bond since Connery and for my money the best actor to play the character. The fact that the series hasn't reach the heights of this film before or since only makes it an easier decision as my all-time favorite film in the franchise.
Even casual fans can get their money's worth out of this. If you only watch one Bond film, make it this one. Daniel Craig revitalizes the Bond franchise the same way Bale saved Batman.
This was a throwback to the good ol days of Connery Bond. Almost all the the good stuff i heard about Casino is true. It is indeed one of the best Bonds ever and I'm really looking forward to the next installment.
Now - I hate when people say this but here goes - this movie was just too darn long. Don't even TRY to introduce a romance two hours into a film.
More Top Movies Trailers. DC's Legends of Tomorrow: Part of the Collection: Post Share on Facebook. View All Videos 1. View All Photos Movie Info James Bond's first mission takes him to Madagascar, where he is to spy on a terrorist Mollaka.
Not everything goes as planned and Bond decides to investigate, independently of the MI6 agency, in order to track down the rest of the terrorist cell.
Following a lead to the Bahamas, he encounters Dimitrios and his girlfriend, Solange. He learns that Dimitrios is involved with Le Chiffre, banker to the world's terrorist organizations.
Full Review Original Score: Nick Rogers The Film Yap. Proponents of this dreadfully indulgent cabaret, which thumbs its nose at coherence, have called its nigh-impenetrable plot the sincerest form of satire.
That's like citing the indecipherable nature of Zapf Dingbats as a foremost send-up of language. A magnificent mess, it's either the greatest argument against LSD or the worst.
Charles Cassady Common Sense Media. Kim Newman Empire Magazine. Despite being not officially a Bond film this is good solid, entertaining action.
Poor is now lost in a hall of distorting mirrors. Stefan Birgir Stefansson sbs. Peter Sellers has some amusing gags as the gambler, the chance of dressing up in various guises and a neat near-seduction scene with Ursula Andress.
Casino Royale is two hours and eleven minutes of non sequitur. We sit, we no bid! The self-driving milk float chase is far better made than the car chases in many Bond films.
By the end of the film, it is best to be drunk or high, but if you are in the right mood with the right company, it is every bit as delightful as any comedy out there.
I tried doing that with friends after we saw how deliciously insane the finale was, but we eventually got bored and just shut it off. Ironically, I was discussing CR1 with an associate yesterday.
I was explaining how someone had recorded it off of TV and incredibly tedious it was to watch. In their original TV series, Python had the running gag of ending sketch with the entrance of a policeman.
I always heard the horror stories, but the cast and crew just seemed to fantastic to be so awful. And I was completely wrong.
The actors were wholly wasted. I would have love to have been in the room to see the execs gaping at the dailies. Yeesh what a terrible film.
After watching every single James Bond movie, this is the worst. A View to a Kill is much funnier than this movie. Ah, the wonder and the glory of the original Casino Royale.